You bring a real case from your daily work. We spend 90 focused minutes on that case and build a sensible AI-supported way of working around it.
No abstract demo, no anonymous standard course, but a clearly framed format for one concrete question.
Many professionals already have a rough sense of what AI can do. The real bottleneck begins when there is one specific document, process, report, tendering task, note, or communication problem on the table. This format starts exactly there.
The format is strongest when the question can be worked on visibly within 90 minutes.
For example reports, notes, minutes, technical texts, templates, or internal text blocks.
For example how to work through standards, PDFs, or technical sources more effectively with AI.
For example a repeated process that costs too much manual structure or writing work.
For example client emails, project summaries, or specialist explanations.
For example text preparation, structuring, or standardization of repeated parts.
For example how to make scattered specialist knowledge more usable for repeated work.
The value does not come from more slides. It comes from immediate transfer. Instead of going through a broad seminar first, you work directly on a task that already matters in your professional context.
If you first need a broader entry point for your role, AI for Energy Consultants, AI for Architects, or AI for MEP Planners is usually the better choice. Bring Your Own Problem is best when one real case already exists.
Choose a suitable slot. In the booking note, write one short sentence about the problem and the material you want to bring.
You do not need a long request. One clear sentence is enough: what is the problem, where does it get stuck, and what material will you bring?
A document, a repeated workflow, a communication task, a research question, or a clearly scoped writing and structure problem.
The more concrete, the better. Often it is enough if you can describe where the friction is and what material belongs to it.
There should be one main topic. Related side points are fine, but the format depends on clear focus.
No. The format develops sensible ways of working with AI, but it does not replace legal or professional case review.
No. It only helps if you can bring the problem and the related material.
A clearer structure, a more concrete next working path, and in many cases a usable first result or starting point.
90 focused live minutes for one clearly scoped practical problem.